Thread: X3210 or E6850?
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11/06/07, 20:45
syphus's Avatar
syphus syphus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Far away
Posts: 2,034
syphus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to syphus Send a message via AIM to syphus Send a message via MSN to syphus Send a message via Yahoo to syphus
The E6850 will be considerably faster than the X3210 in most situations due to the 866 MHz gap. There are only a few hypothetical situations where you can benefit from the additional 2 cores in the X3210.

It's hard enough to design an application to get good performance out of two cores, let alone four. You may only experience a benefit when loading the system heavily with multiple intensive tasks. This will uncover bottlenecks elsewhere, such as the FSB, memory speed, disk speed etc.

The E6850 is a better overall choice.